Penal Code 350 PC
PC 350 – Manufacturing or Selling Counterfeit Marks
Manufacturing, Selling Counterfeit Marks – Table of Contents
- PC 350 Overview
- PC 350 Sentencing
- PC 350 Defending
- Manufacturing, Selling Counterfeit Marks – Hire Us
It is unlawful for any person, or business entity, who willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Does the act of fraud get committed under Penal Code 350?
Yes. Fraud is inducing another to surrender real property, personal property, a designation of authority or standing based on a misrepresentation of a material fact that causes detriment to another for personal gain.
What is the definition of a mark, as counterfeited, under PC 350?
A trademark, as defined as a “mark”, under Penal Code 350 PC, is any mark, logo, identification or designation that is used in connection with identifying a good or service that is notated as genuine and registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the purpose of conducting commerce which allows people to transact with a business identifying the goods and service exhibiting the mark for value.
For clarification, a mark is a designated reference to a good or service. Therefore, a completed good, or a completed provision of service can only constitute one unit of USPTO identifier which signifies value. And that one unit is noted as one article. Equally, the counterfeit mark must refer to the same. If there is computer equipment, the disassembled parts to those component parts are not associated with the mark unless they are patented as unique and distinguished from the trade. The mark extends not only to goods and services but any accessories, components, manuals, or terms that signify the value.
How does the term “spurious” get associated with a violation of Penal Code 350 PC?
This indicates that the accused might have an authentic registered mark from the USPTO; but as pertinent to the terms of the agreement, exceeded the scope and purpose of the contract by creating more units as permitted by the original holder of the USPTO mark, or exceeded the scope of utilization as authorized by the original holder of the USPTO mark. An illustration of this would contracting for 100 units with a designated mark, licensee of the mark designed to create 1000 units.
What is the mental state required for a violation of Penal Code 350 PC?
The mental state required for a violation of Pena Code 350 PC is willful and intentionally. Willful means a person does an act on purpose, knowing its unlawful characteristics, and desires its result. Intentional means a person has a conscious desire to do an act on purpose and desires the consequences necessary to achieve the result.
Willful, as a mental state, to be charged with a violation of Penal Code 350 PC, the State must prove that the accused, beyond a reasonable doubt, knew the conduct was unlawful and acted with the purpose to disobey the law. The State does not have to prove the accused had an evil motive.
Intentional, as a mental state, to be charged with a violation of Penal Code 350 PC, the State must prove that the accused, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused had a conscious desire or purpose to act in a way to cause a certain result or knew that acting in such a way would procure the results desired.
In application to Penal Code 350 PC: First, the accused knew that he had a mark that was counterfeit because it was not registered with the USPTO, or that the person was not given rights to possess that mark by the registrant of the USPTO identifier, and knew that doing so was unlawful but acted purposefully to misrepresent the fact that the service of goods associated with that counterfeit mark was authentic, and another person relied on that misrepresentation to their detriment, for the personal gain of the accused; Second, the accused consciously desired to use a mark that was counterfeit because it was not registered with the USPTO, or that the person was not given rights to possess that mark by the registrant of the USPTO identifier; and knew that doing so, would lead to the detriment of another, for the personal gain of the accused, because the accused had a mark that was not registered with the USPTO, nor was given rights to possess that mark by the registrant of the USPTO identifier, but misrepresented fact to another who believed the mark’s authenticity to transact for the good or service for the value.
Are any business entities exempted under Penal Code 350 PC?
Yes. Sole proprietorships.
A violation of Penal Code 350 PC is charged as either a misdemeanor or felony:
If it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the violation involved less than 1,000 articles with the value to be less than the threshold for grand theft, punishment includes confinement of no more than 1 year in county jail; but as a private party the fines not to exceed $10,000 dollars; but as a commercial entity the fines not to exceed $200,000 dollars.
If it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the violation involved more than 1,000 articles with the value to be greater than or equal to the threshold for grand theft, punishment includes confinement of no more than 1 year in county jail or 16 months, 2, 3 years in prison; but as a private party the fines not to exceed $500,000 dollars; but as a commercial entity the fines not to exceed $ 1,000,000 dollars.
If this is a subsequent conviction no matter if the articles are more or less than 1,000 units, and the threshold of grand theft is either not equal to, equal to, or exceeding the threshold; punishment for not exceeding the threshold with less than 1,000 articles is confinement not exceeding 1 year in jail with fines not exceeding $100,000 dollars; but if the threshold is exceeded or equal to, confinement is 16 months, 2, 3 years in prison with fines not exceeding $400,000 dollars.
If the first conviction causes serious bodily injury, that is foreseeable: with articles less than 1,000 and the threshold is not met, the punishment is confinement of 16 months, 2, 3, 4 years in prison with fines not exceeding $100,000 dollars; but if the articles are more than 1,000 with the threshold equal to or more, confinement is 16 months, 2, 3, 4 years in prison with fines not exceeding $400,000 dollars.
Any conviction or plea of nolo contendere (plea to the facts but not admitting guilt), a summary forfeiture or criminal forfeiture proceeding can ensue resulting in the confiscation and destruction of all goods and services bearing the counterfeit mark; including all assets utilized to transport, manufacture or advertise the relevance of the counterfeit mark.
If there is community property or an exemption that applies under statute that property will be released to the non-offending owner. If that property is under term of lease, or revocable trust per terms or conditions, that lease and or terms will prevail with the property being sent back to its original status.
What is an example of a violation of Penal Code 350 PC?
- Leigh wanted to get some money quickly to pay for law school. Leigh had a family friend, Peggy, who just started a dog walking business that quickly took notice from several investors and the media because of the business’s ability to pair dog walkers with dogs in competition form of walking that promoted: the health of the dogs, the retained assurances of their owners, and signified the quality of the employees and contractors hired. The company was featured in Variety and LA Times. Peggy, at the same time of placed her articles of incorporation in the mail to the Secretary of State by certified mail and did the same for the USPTO for the trademark and copyright of her company name, “Peggy” and logo, “A circle with a Labrador head in the middle”. Leigh created an NFT with name Peg curving on top of a Labrador head on a coin. Kids, and dog purists quickly purchased the coin. Netting Leigh approximately $12 million dollars. Peggy kindly asked Leigh to associate the coin with her business, but Leigh refused saying the coin was not a derivative of her brand. Several weeks later, Peggy’s business was designated as a corporation in the State of California. Peggy and it were featured on MSNBC- prior to filing an IPO Peggy filed a cease-and-desist order against Leigh, prior to suing her friend for infringement. Leigh did not comply with the order, as it was granted. Peggy called the police, and Leigh was arrested.
- Common usage not specified to the mark – too many people have utilized methods not so much to copy the mark as counterfeit but promote a common term phrase or social significance for which the mark is coincidentally associated with.
- Prior agreement/ Course of dealings – The behavior of the parties must continue despite USPTO registration because of course of dealings and usage of trade that would lead to a detriment of the accused’s businesses and profits and cause a disruption upon a conviction.
- Mistake in Law – The entity is a sole proprietorship.
- Mistake in Fact
- Non designation with USPTO – The mark in question lacks the significant characteristics required to qualify as counterfeit
If you are charged with a violation of Penal Code 350 PC call The Esfandi Law Group, APLC. Contact Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Seppi Esfandi, principal attorney of The Esfandi Law Group, APLC.
Need a Criminal Defense Attorney? CALL NOW: 310-274-6529
Seppi Esfandi is an Expert Criminal Defense Attorney who has over 20 years of practice defending a variety of criminal cases.
What Our Clients Say
Very sharp and very detailed! Thanks Paul you're one of the best in the business and you set an excellent example of a good quality attorney that cares!- Erick Glover
Chris demonstrated both a compassionate ear as well as a logical, realistic approach to the issues that arose. He consistently responded quickly to both email and phone correspondence.- Bonnie Tova
Chris has handled my contentious divorce case for the last year. He has listened to me and guided me along the way through the court system. I highly highly recommend him.- P.K.
Chris Moore was always extremely diligent and 'on point' with me every step of the way. He was honest, respectful, straightforward, and very competent. He exceeded my expectations.- D.A.