Penal Code 409 PC, 416 PC

PC 409, PC 416 – Refusal To Disperse

PC 409 and PC 416 - Refusal To Disperse

Refusal To Disperse – Table of Contents

PC 409 & 416 – Overview

Our Constitution makes it a right for individuals to assemble and freely associate with one another in public under one common cause. However, there are some situations where public officers have to order assembled individuals to disperse if they pose a danger to life, property, or both like in a riot.

Failure to disperse as commanded by law enforcement could be labeled a criminal offense under California Penal Code Section 409 PC or California Penal Code Section 416 PC. The California Penal Code 409 PC makes it an offense for an individual to remain at a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly after they have been ordered to disperse. On the other hand, the California Penal Code 416 PC outlaws remain at an assembly where two or more people have gathered to disturb the peace or commit an unlawful act after being asked to disperse by law enforcement.

PC 409 & 416 – Sentencing

Both Penal Codes 409 PC and 416 PC are charged as misdemeanors. If convicted, the defendant could be sentenced with:

  • A maximum jail sentence of 6 months in county
  • A fine of up to $ 1000
  • Informal probation

In some cases, the judge may also order the defendant to pay restitution for any damages caused by the crime.

You should note the defendant can also face other penalties if the unlawful assemblies turn violent. The prosecutor may include the additional charges tied to the violent acts committed, such as assault, if they can prove the defendant was individually responsible for any of these acts.

Crimes Related To Failure To Disperse

PC 409 & 416 – Prosecuting

While these statutes are similar, the prosecutor does have to prove different elements for each statute to get the defendant convicted for either one. To be convicted under the California Penal Code Section 409 PC, the prosecutor has to prove without a reasonable doubt that:

  • The defendant was present at the scene of a riot, rout, or unlawful assembly
  • A public officer clearly ordered all those gathered including, the defendant, to disperse.
  • The defendant willingly decided to stay at the present scene despite the order to disperse
  • The defendant was not a public officer or emergency personnel assisting in dispersing the riot, rout, or unlawful assembly.

For the prosecutor to get you convicted for failing to disperse under California Penal Code 416 PC. They have to provide solid proof for the following elements:

  • The defendant assembled with one or more individuals intending to disturb the peace or carry out an unlawful act.
  • The public officer had probable cause to believe the purpose of the assembly was unlawful.
  • The public officer legally notified the defendant to disperse
  • The defendant willingly remained at the scene despite the order to disperse.

Note for the defendant to be prosecuted under either of these statutes. The public officer has to ensure the whole assembly has been informed to disperse. The officer must convey their order in a way everyone can clearly hear. Plus, the officer is not mandated to use a specific set of words. The words used must be enough to inform any reasonable person that the officer is acting in an official capacity and is instructing the assembly to leave the current location.

PC 409 & 416 – Defenses

Based on the circumstances of your case, there are a couple of strategies that a criminal defense lawyer can use to argue your case and get your charges dismissed under California Penal Codes 409 or 416 PC. Some of these strategies include:

The Assembly Was Not Unlawful or Violent

People who assemble in a lawful and non-violent should not be asked to disperse under these statutes. They are simply exercising their constitutional rights, which they are legally allowed to do. Thus, if the defendant was participating in a lawful assembly. They should not be charged for failing to disperse according to PC 409 or 416.

Did Not Receive Clear Orders To Disperse

The defendant needs to have received clear and precise orders to leave a certain area for them to be in violation of failing to disperse. Thus, if the defendant did not hear or understand the instruction, they should not be convicted for failure to disperse.

Refusal To Disperse – Hire Us

If you are facing charges under either PC 409 or PC 416, hiring an experienced criminal defense lawyer like Seppi Esfandi is your best chance to get favorable results. Esfandi has a substantial amount of experience handling riot-related cases and will do everything in his power to successfully defend your case.

Need a Criminal Defense Attorney? CALL NOW: 310-274-6529

Seppi Esfandi is an Expert Criminal Defense Attorney who has over 20 years of practice defending a variety of criminal cases.

Read our Client Reviews

Contact Us:         
Esfandi Law Group QR Code
Esfandi Law Group
Lara S.
June 4, 2018
5
Seppi had my case reduced to just an infraction, and thanks to him I was able to keep my job. Jorge was extremely helpful too, the reason I went with this law firm. Overall pleased.

What Our Clients Say

  • five-star reviewVery sharp and very detailed! Thanks Paul you're one of the best in the business and you set an excellent example of a good quality attorney that cares!- Erick Glover

  • five-star reviewChris demonstrated both a compassionate ear as well as a logical, realistic approach to the issues that arose. He consistently responded quickly to both email and phone correspondence.- Bonnie Tova

  • five-star reviewChris has handled my contentious divorce case for the last year. He has listened to me and guided me along the way through the court system. I highly highly recommend him.- P.K.

  • five-star reviewChris Moore was always extremely diligent and 'on point' with me every step of the way. He was honest, respectful, straightforward, and very competent. He exceeded my expectations.- D.A.

Get a Free Consultation

    Contact Us Form