UIC 2101 – California Unemployment Insurance EDD Fraud

UIC 2101 - EDD Fraud

EDD Fraud – Table of Contents

UIC 2101 – Overview

The Unemployment Insurance program in California was started in 1935. State Unemployment Insurance, sometimes called “UI,” is a hybrid federal-state insurance program administered by the Employment Development Department (EDD).

Employers finance UI because it is intended to aid those who have lost their employment through no fault. Unemployment insurance (UI) claimants may get weekly benefits of up to $450 if they qualify.

UIC 2101(a)

It is an offense in this chapter to make a false statement or representation willfully, to withhold knowledge of a material fact knowingly, or to use a false name, social security number or any other false identification to obtain, enhance, decrease, or defeat any benefit or payment under any of the following statutes administered by the department, whether for the maker or any other person:

  1. The rules are set out in this division.
  2. The guidelines of any federal statute governing unemployment insurance.
  3. The terms of any federal statute governing training allowances.
  4. The terms of any federal statute governing trade readjustment allowances.
  5. The terms of any other federal government allowance legislation.

UIC 2101(b)

Nothing in this section should be interpreted as preventing the Penal Code’s Section 470 from being applied to any actions or omissions that contradict it.
Employers may be responsible for unemployment insurance fraud.

California’s unemployment insurance fraud laws apply to both employees and employers. Examples of employer-committed EDD fraud include:

  • Knowingly lying about why a former employee was dismissed or how much the person earned to avoid paying into the unemployment insurance program, or
  • willfully withholding deductions from workers and not paying them to the Employment Development Department.

Examples of unemployment insurance fraud

  • Obtaining unemployment benefits by creating a false identity
  • Collecting unemployment benefits while working elsewhere and without disclosing it
  • Using a different person’s unemployment check without their consent
  • Receiving benefits from a state you don’t live in
  • Not actively seeking new employment or providing fraudulent grounds for unemployment.

UIC 2101 – Penalties

Section 2101 of the Unemployment Insurance Code

If discovered defrauding the system and found guilty of unemployment insurance fraud, they will face severe punishments. This offense is a “wobbler” in California, which means it may be sentenced as either a misdemeanor or felony. If it is a misdemeanor under UIC Section 2101, you might face the following:

  • Penalties of up to $20,000
  • One year or more in county jail

If it is a felony under this code provision, you may be subject to the following:

  • 16 months, or two years to three years in state jail, as well as,
  • penalties of up to $20,000

Section 550 of the Penal Code

Additionally, the prosecutor can decide to file charges against you under California Penal Code Section 550, the state’s general insurance fraud law. Similarly, depending on how much money you get via deception, you might be charged with a felony or a misdemeanor. If the fraud is under $950, it is considered a misdemeanor and is penalized by:

  • $1,000 in maximum penalties
  • Six months or more in a county jail

The following are the misdemeanor penalties if the fraud exceeds $950:

  • $10,000 in maximum penalties
  • One year or more in county jail

The repercussions for a felony conviction are far more severe. These sanctions consist of the following:

  • 2, 3, or 5 years in state jail,
  • up to $50,000 in penalties, or
  • double the amount of fraud, whichever is larger.

UIC 2101 – Defenses

The most common legal defenses are as follows:

Lack of Fraudulent Intent

While ignorance of the unemployment law is not per se a defense, it may help show that no dishonest intent was involved. Reasons for leaving or being let go from your employment would fall under this category. You may have entered an incorrect Social Security number or thought you could keep collecting benefits while working fewer hours than required.

Insufficient Evidence

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is needed to find you guilty. This includes evidence of criminal intent and knowledge of the criminal activity. You will not be charged or prosecuted if the evidence is insufficient to incriminate you.

Negotiating a Plea Deal

In certain situations of unemployment insurance fraud, your guilt is beyond question. In such circumstances, your attorney may seek to negotiate a fair plea deal with the prosecutor.

When there are no vulnerabilities in the evidence against you for fraud, a plea bargain is a very effective means of mitigating culpability. The prosecution can agree to a reduced criminal charge and punishment in return for your “guilty” or “no contest” plea.

UIC 2101 – Hire Us

An attorney may either go to trial on behalf of a client charged with violating Unemployment Insurance Code Section 2101 or attempt to negotiate a more lenient plea agreement on their behalf. Proposition 36 sentencing provides for a suspended sentence to include probation and drug treatment in the case of defendants guilty under Health and Safety Code Section 2101.

Need an Attorney? CALL NOW: 310-274-6529

Seppi Esfandi is an Expert Attorney who has over 21 years of practice defending a variety of cases.

Contact Us:         
Esfandi Law Group QR Code
Esfandi Law Group
Lara S.
June 4, 2018
5
Seppi had my case reduced to just an infraction, and thanks to him I was able to keep my job. Jorge was extremely helpful too, the reason I went with this law firm. Overall pleased.

What Our Clients Say

  • five-star reviewVery sharp and very detailed! Thanks Paul you're one of the best in the business and you set an excellent example of a good quality attorney that cares!- Erick Glover

  • five-star reviewChris demonstrated both a compassionate ear as well as a logical, realistic approach to the issues that arose. He consistently responded quickly to both email and phone correspondence.- Bonnie Tova

  • five-star reviewChris has handled my contentious divorce case for the last year. He has listened to me and guided me along the way through the court system. I highly highly recommend him.- P.K.

  • five-star reviewChris Moore was always extremely diligent and 'on point' with me every step of the way. He was honest, respectful, straightforward, and very competent. He exceeded my expectations.- D.A.

Get a Free Consultation

    Contact Us Form